Heading to SXSW this week? If so, we hope to see you there! We don’t have any parties to promote and we aren’t doing any random contests – but we are offering FREE coffee!! And if you’ve been to SXSW before, you know caffeine will be a staple to surviving SXSW.
When we started gearing up for SXSW back in July, yeah I said July, we had a hunch that privacy and the collection of consumer data would be a hot topic. It turned out the SXSW committee agreed. As you’ll see below, we are participating in two panels tha
t will be discussing privacy policies, consumers’ concern with data collection and the FTC regulations currently looming around the ban on tracking consumers’ web activity. If you’re involved in the internet advertising industry, these panels should be added to your must see list!
And it gets better. If you attend one of our panels and find one of our team members (they’ll be decked out in Rubicon gear), we’ll give you a Starbucks gift card. Deets on the panels are below.
Hope to share a beverage with you in Austin! Follow the team on Twitter @rubiconproject.com.
Session: Smackdown: Consumers Privacy vs. Advertiser Revenue
Date/Time: Friday, 3/12, 2:00-3:00pm
Location: Hilton C
Moderator: Alan Chapell, Privacy Advisor to BlueKai
Panelists: Jordan Mitchell, VP of Data Intelligence at the Rubicon Project
Alison Pepper, Director of Privacy Policy at IAB
Ingrid Sanders, AdAdvisor at TargusInfo
Jay Habegger, Co-Founder & CEO of OwnerIQ
In early 2009 the Federal Trade Commission became more vocal on its opinions regarding online advertising and privacy policies. To sum it up, the FTC has basically been saying advertisers are not disclosing how they collect information on users well enough. So what could happen to the future of advertising and online publishers if the FTC bans tracking consumers’ web activity? Let’s discuss options, actions the industry is currently taking and the potential risks to advertisers and consumers if the bill passes.
Session: Data Control: Who’s Nibbling on Your Cookie?
Date/Time: Tuesday, 3/16, 12:30pm – 1:30pm
Location: Hilton E
Core conversation lead by: Frank Addante, CEO of the Rubicon Project and Benett Kelly, Founder of Internet Law Center
Consumers are concerned with being tracked too much online and with information being collected for advertising purposes. Yet in the same vein, consumers want to be served with relevant information online. Instead of pointing fingers, let’s discuss how to balance the benefits of data openness with the need for privacy.

From NYTimes.com: Instant Ads Set the Pace on the Web
March 12th, 2010 Posted by: kweberWe read with great interest Stephanie Clifford’s article in the New York Times on real-time bidding, “Instant Ads Set the Pace on the Web,” this morning.
At the Rubicon Project, we’re watching the evolution of real-time bidding very carefully as we are deeply concerned about the true impact of this buzz-worthy new technology on the value of inventory for publishers. RTB is attention-grabbing, indeed – but it’s not necessarily all good news for publishers of digital content.
“The RTB ecosystem has been characterized by a lot of technology investment in buy-side optimization tools that attempt to buy high-quality inventory for the lowest possible price,” noted Tom Shields, CEO of Yieldex, which provides publishers with yield optimization and analytics tools for premium inventory, in our Q309 Online Advertising Market Report. “Publishers would be wise to be wary of exchanges until they can deploy equivalent tools that maximize their revenues, rather than minimize their inventory value.”
It’s still early in the game for RTB platforms, but the past two years have shown that once inventory gets pumped into an exchange or demand-side platform that’s designed for advertisers, and not designed to boost a publisher’s yield, it’s likely to have a negative impact on a site’s brand value - the value of its audience falls by the wayside in a bidded race to the bottom.
“As with any new technology or capability like RTB, I think it is extremely important to invest the time up front to best understand the potential impact(s) to your business and create a well thought out short- and longer-term strategy about how to best leverage for increased revenue with proper pricing controls and insight,” said Jason Kelly, Vice President of Strategy & Revenue Management, Digital at Time Inc. (again in our Q309 market report). “There are a lot of lessons learned about how we as a publisher community managed the rapid proliferation of ad networks early on, without a significant amount of investment up front to clearly identify the longer term impacts on our overall channel management strategy. We are now working our way forward as an industry through investment in strategy, people and technology like the Rubicon Project and others to more actively manage these channels - and RTB falls into that category.”
Many of these platforms ultimately value all inventory equally, from the New York Times or Sports Illustrated, to a niche WordPress sports blog. For certain ads, that’s okay. But publishers correctly argue that a reader that sees an ad against the trusted brand of a well-known site is more valuable than a reader seeing the ad on a site they don’t fully trust.
At the Rubicon Project, our priority is to help publishers gain access to the most possible sources of demand, and offer industry-leading technology to automate that access - but only with careful consideration of the impact on pricing for publishers.
As we detailed in our recently published manifesto, “PRINCIPLES of a REVVOLUTION or, the ad server is dead,” we are committed to providing publishers with efficient and safe access to all sources of demand. From principle # 3:
“There is a proliferation of companies focused on servicing advertisers who spend online. Continued global expansion and an underlying shift in how digital ad dollars are transacted [e.g. increased use of auction-based pricing, and development of demand-side platforms (DSPs), and real-time bidding (RTB)] will result in more disparate sources of demand for publishers. The advent of DSPs and RTB tools for demand channels adds revenue opportunity for both sales partners and publishers but also comes with the cost of further fragmentation and risk. Our priority is to help publishers gain access to all possible sources of demand through industry-leading technology that automates that access - but with careful consideration of the impact of those technologies on pricing control for publishers.”
We will provide publishers with a safe, efficient and profitable way to transact with all demand channels available to monetize their inventory.
Posted in Fun, Industry Commentary, LA tech scene, ad networks |